| 000 | 01211nam a22001697a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 190312b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 245 |
_aManagerial myopia and the mortgage meltdown / by Adam C. Kolasinski, Nan Yang _cAdam C. Kolasinski, Nan Yang |
||
| 260 |
_aAmsterdam _bElsevier _c June 2018 |
||
| 300 | _aPages 466-485 | ||
| 440 |
_aJournal of Financial Economic _v128 (3) _x0304-405X |
||
| 520 | _aAbstract Prominent policy makers assert that managerial short-termism was at the root of the subprime crisis of 2007–2009. Prior scholarly research, however, largely rejects this assertion. Using a more comprehensive measure of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) incentives for short-termism, we uncover evidence that short-termism indeed played a role. Firms whose CEOs were contractually allowed to sell or exercise more of their stock and options holdings sooner had more subprime exposure, a higher probability of financial distress, and lower risk-adjusted stock returns during the crisis, as well as higher fines and settlements for subprime-related fraud. | ||
| 690 | _aFinancial crisis | ||
| 690 | _aSubprime mortgages | ||
| 690 | _aFinancial fraud | ||
| 690 | _aCEO incentives | ||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cSE |
||
| 999 |
_c361344 _d361344 |
||