<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01381nam a22001937a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">190323b        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0304-405X</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cyclical investment behavior across financial institutions / by Yannick Timmer</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Yannick Timmer</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Elsevier</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">August 2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pages 268-286</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="440" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Journal of Financial Economics</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">129 (2)</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0304-405X</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abstract
This paper contrasts the investment behavior of different financial institutions in debt securities as a response to past returns. For identification, I use unique security-level data from the German Microdatabase Securities Holdings Statistics. Banks and investment funds respond in a procyclical manner to past security-specific holding period returns. In contrast, insurance companies and pension funds act countercyclically; they buy when returns have been negative and sell after high returns. The heterogeneous responses can be explained by differences in their balance sheet structure. I exploit within-sector variation in the financial constraint to show that tighter constraints are associated with relatively more procyclical investment behavior.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Portfolio allocation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Investment behavior</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Financial markets</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Debt securities</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="690" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Balance sheet constraints</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">SE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">361362</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">361362</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">lcc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">PER</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-03-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-03-23 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2019-03-23</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">SE</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
